Homeopathy

Homeopathy and the doudt

One of the medicines alternatives with more participants is the homeopathy. In the source of lacienciaysusdemonios, this therapy is formulated for the use of lacking active ingredients, analyzing on belief that the same cure the same. Also, the dose is in diluted form and can be alcohol or water for the solute. This idea has an awkward statement for me because if you want to cure the antigen, you can’t add something equal. In addition, the homeopathy is one of the choice medicine that isn’t trustier.

            Indeed, the website salud180 gives us an advice before the use of this technique. For me, the points of discussion in the references are very whimsical. The trivialness is the response of the doubt on the practice. For instance, the use of homeopathy:  find information about the adequate dose, consult with your primary doctor and didn’t you use a substance that interferes with the treatment. In fact, exists the opposition of the exhibition of the body with this antidote.

According to lacienciaysusdemonios, the homeopathy has a big hole of questions that reproduce the opposition. The website exposes examples of the impotence for the homeopath.  The solutions in homeopathy aren’t having active ingredients (a simple water), the fundaments of equality lack experimental basis, contradicts the biological knowledge and not exist proven comparison of the effectiveness are some reasons of the rebound in the homeopathy. It’s very puzzled that the lack of the validity in the practice isn’t showing in statistics or anything quantitative. In my opinion, I put away the alternative of exploring for this sphere.